Interactive e-learning course vs. video

What do you have in mind hearing the expression ‘e-learning’? I am constantly surprised that most people instantaneously will think of a video. They will either imagine videos in which an expert can be seen talking (more or less a recorded lecture – but without any chance to interact with the lecturer) or high-quality animation videos – either as a cartoon or even as 3D animation.

Of course, videos can be used in e-learning. But not exclusively. You can also use screencasts, searchable PDFs, software simulations or – an interactive e-learning course, in which the learners are involved, must actively adopt the content, may have to answer small quiz questions or pass a final test. A video can be part of an interactive e-learning course. It doesn’t work the other way around.

I personally almost always prefer the interactive course over a video. I feel less exposed to it, less forced to passively consume content at a predefined pace in a certain order. At best, I’m bored. Unfortunately, I am usually irritated because the pace is too slow or too fast for me, or I would like to skip a topic, or I simply don’t like watching the person speaking.

Certainly, videos with a lecturing expert are to be produced quickly and it no longer needs a lot of technology to produce a respectable result. However, it will be difficult if something is to be changed afterwards. Moreover, these videos are often incredibly boring. Unfortunately, most experts on a particular topic are not necessarily experts in interesting mediation. In a boring lecture at the university, I could at least ask one (or more) question(s) to keep myself awake.

So far, I have only seen one video series from an expert, in which I voluntarily watched several videos in a row. The expert was also an actor and speaker at the same time. That helped a lot. (http://www.hoensbroech.de/severin/)

If you have a 3D animation in mind, e.g. blood cells racing through the bloodstream, then effort, expanse and learning success are in many cases no longer in a reasonable relationship. This might be fancy, but most commonly, it will clearly exceed the budget.

It is important to keep the learning objective in mind and to consider how it can be achieved most skillfully. Based on the target group, the topic – but of course also on the resources that are available. And certainly, different methods can be combined with each other …

Eine Treppe führt in einer surrealen Landschaft zu einer einzelnen Tür.

Lernen messbar machen – aber was messen wir eigentlich?

Lernen messbar machen ist in vielen Organisationen ein wichtiges Ziel. Gleichzeitig wird erstaunlich selten gefragt, was dabei eigentlich als[…]

Implizites Wissen: Warum KI an Grenzen stößt

Implizites Wissen: Warum KI an Grenzen stößt

Warum Wissen sich nicht einfach in Köpfe hineinfüllen – oder aus ihnen herausziehen lässt „Könnte man nicht einfach das[…]

KI und Lernen - Symbolbild

Kann KI lernen – oder zeigt sie uns nur, was Lernen nicht ist?

Künstliche Intelligenz verändert gerade viele Bereiche unserer Arbeit und unseres Alltags. Auch das Lernen bleibt davon nicht unberührt. Vor[…]

Bei einem RAG-Modell entscheidet die hinterlegte Wissensbasis, welche Perspektiven in eine Antwort einfließen. Qualität beginnt bei der Auswahl.

KI ist so klug wie ihre Bibliothek

In den letzten Tagen habe ich viel darüber nachgedacht, was es eigentlich konkret bedeutet, KI zu entwickeln. Nicht im[…]

KI 2025 - Ausblick auf Schneebedeckte Schneelandschaft

KI 2025 im Unternehmen: Rückblick, Ausblick & Verantwortung

Rückblick und Ausblick Kurz vor den Feiertagen und dem Jahreswechsel ist es ein guter Moment, innezuhalten. Ein Moment, um[…]

Gemüsekiste

Ich bin ein Feedback-Fan

Manchmal zeigen kleine Alltagsmomente deutlicher als jede Theorie, wie wertvoll ehrliches Feedback wirklich ist. Seit vielen Jahren bekomme ich[…]